Free Mp3 Ringtones

[kennyli0302i]

NFL fans jerseys,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
(Related from: [link widoczny dla zalogowanych])
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] Take Jerry Jones as the prime example. Anyone who can spend $1 billion on a stadium surely can't be hurting for cash.
I also know that a big part of the problem is that the players in the NFL -- which just so happens to be the most popular of the four major sports -- have a poor health care program. With all the talk the owners and league officials have started about protecting players,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and with the problems surrounding the new info on concussions,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], shouldn't the NFL and its owners put its money where its mouth is and take better care of these players? I think they should. To me,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it would be smart business; protecting what they have their money invested in.
(Related from: [link widoczny dla zalogowanych])
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] One of the last big issues is that the NFL wants to add two regular season games,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], pushing the season from 16 to 18 games. The players think this will put them in greater danger of being injured, but the extra games would take the place of two preseason games. Not only would it be better for the league -- who watches preseason games? -- but I think it would be better for the players and for football in general.
The players would still have two games to ease into the season (after spring camp and training camp) and I think we'd see a lot tighter divisional races. Those two games could be used to fuel the fire in some of football's best rivalries. We could see more Patriots-Jets,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Broncos-Chiefs,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Packers-Bears and Cowboys-Giants games.
I think what I'm trying to get at is I completely agree with the cartoon I saw. When it comes to the CBA, the players are on one side and the owners are on the other,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with the fans stuck in the middle. We're the ones who are going to be most hurt if there's no football in 2011-12.
Think about the small American towns that thrive on football. Green Bay is a good example. The
state of Wisconsin doesn't have a major team to replace the Packers with. There's no way the Brewers are going to make up for the loss of money the Packers bring to Wisconsin.
If there's any question about just how huge the impact will spread if football goes on any kind of hiatus,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], think about this: More than 800 million people around the world tuned in to watch the Super Bowl this month. Even if,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], like me, fans weren't really interested in either team, we still watched because it's football. Does the NFL really want to kill its own cash cow by being so greedy? I sure hope not.
I saw a cartoon the other day that caught my attention. I'm not talking about SpongeBob SquarePants, but rather a witty illustration somewhere on the internet.
It was titled something like "Who's going to pay for the collective bargaining agreement?" and had a picture of the NFLPA in a car on the left with a pair of players ready for a head-on crash with two NFL owners in a car speeding into the frame from the right.
(Related from: [link widoczny dla zalogowanych])
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] Smack-dab in the middle was an NFL fan -- wearing a number 12 jersey and proudly sporting a huge foam finger -- unknowingly about to be crushed.
At first,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I allowed a little chuckle to escape the slight smirk I felt spread across my lips. Then I realized just how true to the heart of the issue the cartoonist had come.
I purposely know very little about the CBA,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], as it's becoming known. I know I should know more being a fan of the NFL, but I fear that the more I know the more disappointment I'll open myself up to. Just the thought that this month's Super Bowl is the last game I'm going to see until the powers that be come to some sort of agreement scares me.
Here's what I do know: The NFL owners think that their players eat up too much of a team's profit. I did a little reading and found that in the only public financial report -- the Green Bay Packers are owned by the public who have bought shares -- listed the players' portion of the profit was around 58 percent. That didn't seem like a surprise to me.
Then again, I'm the kind of person who believes that the people doing the work,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the players in this instance, should have the bigger piece of the pie. Of course, the owners have their own jobs,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], whatever they may be,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but I think it's obvious they make enough money to not worry about going broke.
(Related from: [link widoczny dla zalogowanych])
Srouce related：


[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]