Free Mp3 Ringtones
Free Mp3 Ringtones. Thousands of Free Mp3 Ringtones in MIDI polyphonic, MP3 and AMR format.
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj
Forum Free Mp3 Ringtones Strona Główna
->
Forum testowe
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Forum testowe
Przegląd tematu
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%" class="forumline"> <tr> <th class="thCornerL" width="22%" height="26">Autor</th> <th class="thCornerR">Wiadomość</th> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>txijle789</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Wysłany: Sob 6:09, 26 Lut 2011<span class="gen"> </span> Temat postu: An important government objective</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">An important government objective <br /><span style="font-weight: bold">An important government objective</span> <br />To be sure, there is substantial circuit court authority applying rational basis review to sexual-orientation classifications. We have carefully examined each of those decisions. Many of them reason only that if consensual same-sex sodomy may be <a href="http://www.colorfulwristband.com/" target="_blank" class="postlink">Wristbands</a> criminalized under Bowers v. Hardwick, then it follows that no heightened review is appropriate - a line of reasoning that does not survive the overruling of Bowers in Lawrence v. Texas, 538 U.S. 558 2003. Others rely on claims regarding "procreational responsibility" that the Department has disavowed already in litigation as unreasonable, or claims regarding the immutability of sexual orientation that we do not believe can be reconciled with more recent social science understandings. And none engages in an examination of all the factors that the Supreme Court has identified as relevant to a decision about the appropriate level of scrutiny. Finally, many of the more recent decisions have relied on the fact that the Supreme Court has not recognized that gays and lesbians constitute a suspect class or the fact that the Court has applied rational basis review in its most recent decisions addressing classifications based on sexual orientation, Lawrence and Romer. But neither of those decisions reached, let alone resolved, the level of scrutiny issue because in both the Court concluded that the laws could not even survive the more deferential rational basis standard. <br />In reviewing a legislative classification under heightened scrutiny, the government must establish that the classification is "substantially related to an important government objective." Clark v. Jeter, 486 U.S. 456, 461 1988. Under heightened scrutiny, "a tenable justification must describe actual state purposes, not rationalizations for actions in fact differently grounded." United States v. Virginia , 518 U.S. 515,<a href="http://www.coccn.cn" target="_blank" class="postlink">google推广</a>, 535-36 1996. "The justification must be genuine, not hypothesized or invented post hoc in response to <a href="http://www.colorfulwristband.com/" target="_blank" class="postlink">Wristbands</a> litigation." Id. at 533.In other words, under heightened scrutiny, the United States cannot defend Section 3 by advancing hypothetical rationales, independent of the legislative record, as it has done in circuits where precedent mandates application of rational basis review. Instead, the United States can defend Section 3 only by invoking Congress' actual justifications for the law. <br />Moreover, the legislative record underlying DOMA's passage contains discussion and debate that undermines any defense under heightened scrutiny. The record contains numerous expressions reflecting moral disapproval of gays and lesbians and their intimate and family relationships - precisely the kind of stereotype-based thinking and animus the Equal Protection Clause is designed to guard against. See Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 448 "mere negative attitudes, or fear" are not permissible bases for discriminatory treatment; see also Romer, 517 U.S. at 635 rejecting rationale that law was supported by "the liberties of landlords or employers who have personal or <a href="http://www.colorfulwristband.com/" target="_blank" class="postlink">Wristbands</a> religious objections to homosexuality"; Palmore v. Sidotti, 466 U.S. 429, 433 1984 "Private biases may be outside the reach of the law, but the law cannot, directly or indirectly, give them effect.". <br />Topics related articles： <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.edu927.com/uc_home/space.php?uid=1906&do=blog&id=47353" target="_blank" class="postlink">An affirmative position on the level of scrutiny</a> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.55yuan.com/space.php?uid=4264&do=blog&id=3340" target="_blank" class="postlink">Chris Paul and the Knicks should be in business</a> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.shazzan.com/tubespace/profile_blogs/txijlejwlew/&action=view&id=311955" target="_blank" class="postlink">The most famous car-fire hydrant collisions</a></span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> </table>
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin
FAQ
Szukaj
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Zaloguj